The BBC's bias allegedly against Welsh and Scottish people is NOTHING as compared with the BBC's bias against the truth...

1740 Hrs GMT 1840 Hrs UK London Thursday 12 June 2008:

KHOODEELAAR! No to unconstitutionality in the UK Houses of Parliament, continuing to examine the role of the Houses of Parliament in suppressing democracy in the UK.... this context is provided by the resignation at 1201 Hrs GMT today [ 1301 Hrs UK time] of David Davis, the Conservative Party's shadow home secretary in the UK House of commons....

The BBC's bias allegedly against Welsh and Scottish people is NOTHING as compared with the BBC's bias against the truth...

To test just how glaring this bias is, look at today’s openly hostile coverage by the BBC of the David Davis resignation...

[To be continued]

KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law Action against Crossrail - more on David Davis 'resignation'-2

KHOODEELAAR! constitutional law Action against Crossrail - more on David Davis 'resignation'-2

[To be continued]

Exposing the truth about the CROSSRAIL hole-plot-backing EVENING STANDARD's 'favourite education expert' Chris Woodhead - [2]

Throughout his time at OFSTED, Chris Woodhead hogged the headlines. One way or another. And most of his 'achievement' was in efficiently lying....

How did he do that?

Didn’t the ‘media’ who were giving Woodhead the platforms know the facts, the truth of what was going on?

The answer is that they did. But they did not care enough to put a halt to the lying time-server...

And the lying self-server.

Woodhead lied when he allowed his mistress Ruth Miskin to be given OFSTED publicity...

He let her have the OFSTED publicity without declaring that he was sleeping with her...He also allowed OFSTED bureaucracy to give Ruth Miskin that particular publicity without showing any interest in making sure that he was not abusing his position or that he was not compromising OFSTED’s neutrality, independence and objectivity...

That grotesque abuse of position by Woodhead was typical of the morally compromised man.

Yet the media generally and the so-called specialist education media in London allowed Woodhead the positive spot that he would not deserve had there been any moral standards.

And therein lies the problem of how the 'mainstream British media' and the allied associated institutions cause and contribute to the creation of unaccountability. How they perpetuate lack of accountability. How they thus make it impossible for any standards to be established fro any sustained amounts of time in society.

For Chris Woodhead was NEVER a deeply thoughtful man in possession of original thoughts and ideas about society.

He was also NEVEr a moral person.

His career as a school teacher should, have given the conclusive evidence to put paid to his pretensions that he was able to confect and flaunt around the time that Tony Blair made him the OFSTED boss.

Back to his disservice to the community in Tower Hamlets where Ruth Miskin was employed as head teacher of a primary school.

For Ruth Miskin was given the publicity for her enterprising ‘work’ whilst she was at the primary school that is situated iN Tower Hamlets.... By ALL standards of scrutiny, evaluation and assessment, the behaviour of Ruth Miskin whilst she was ta that school In Tower Hamlets,maws no different from the behaviour of the ‘average;’ headteacher to be found in a comparable other school in the same borough at that time.

Whatever ‘edge’ the media ascribed and attributed to Ruth Miskin, was really not real.

It was spin.

The only difference being that the spin was decorated with the veneer of ‘professionalism’ as the subject was ‘education’ an allegedly specialist area....

But the lies were unconcealable....undeniable....

The hypes for Ruth Miskin stank of Chris Woodhead ....

[To be continued]

Exposing the truth about the CROSSRAIL hole-plot-backing EVENING STANDARD's 'favourite education expert' Chris Woodhead - [2]

Throughout his time at OFSTED, Chris Woodhead hogged the headlines. One way or another. And most of his 'achievement' was in efficiently lying....

How did he do that?

Didn’t the ‘media’ who were giving Woodhead the platforms know the facts, the truth of what was going on?

The answer is that they did. But they did not care enough to put a halt to the lying time-server...

And the lying self-server.

Woodhead lied when he allowed his mistress Ruth Miskin to be given OFSTED publicity...

He let her have the OFSTED publicity without declaring that he was sleeping with her...

He also allowed OFSTED bureaucracy to give Ruth Miskin that particular publicity without showing any interest in making sure that he was not abusing his position or that he was not compromising OFSTED’s neutrality, independence and objectivity...

That grotesque abuse of position by Woodhead was typical al of the morally compromised man.

Yet the media generally and the so-called specialist education media in London allowed Woodhead the positive spot that would not deserve had there been any moral standards.

And therein lies the problem of how the 'mainstream British media' and the allied associated institutions cause and contribute to the creation of unaccountability. How they perpetuate lack of accountability. How they thus make it impossible for any standards to be established fro any sustained amounts of time in society.

For Chris Woodhead was NEVER a deeply thoughtful man in possession of original thoughts and ideas about society.

He was also NEVEr a moral person.

His career as a school teacher should, have given the conclusive evidence to put paid to his pretensions that he was able to confect and flaunt around the time that Tony Blair made him the OFSTED boss.

Back to his disservice to the community in Tower Hamlets where Ruth Miskin was employed as head teacher of a primary school.

For Ruth Miskin was given the publicity for her enterprising ‘work’ whilst she was at the primary school that is situated iN Tower Hamlets.... By ALL standards of scrutiny, evaluation and assessment, the behaviour of Ruth Miskin whilst she was at that school In Tower Hamlets,maws no different from the behaviour of the ‘average;’ headteacher to be found in a comparable other school in the same borough at that time.

Whatever ‘edge’ the media ascribed and attributed to Ruth Miskin, was really not real. Not substantial. Not original. Not sustainable.

It was spin.

The only difference being that the spin was decorated with the veneer of ‘professionalism’ as the subject was ‘education’ an allegedly specialist area....

But the lies were unconcealable....undeniable....

The PARTICULAR hypes for Ruth Miskin at the particular time stank of Chris Woodhead’s association, involvement and then influence via OFSTED... ....

[To be continued]

Exposing the truth about the CROSSRAIL hole-plot-backing EVENING STANDARD's 'favourite education expert' Chris Woodhead - [2]

Throughout his time at OFSTED, Chris Woodhead hogged the headlines. One way or another. And most of his 'achievement' was in efficiently lying....

How did he do that?

Didn’t the ‘media’ who were giving Woodhead the platforms know the facts, the truth of what was going on?

The answer is that they did. But they did not care enough to put a halt to the lying time-server...

And the lying self-server.

Woodhead lied when he allowed his mistress Ruth Miskin to be given OFSTED publicity...

He let her have the OFSTED publicity without declaring that he was sleeping with her...He also allowed OFSTED bureaucracy to give Ruth Miskin that particular publicity without showing any interest in making sure that he was not abusing his position or that he was not compromising OFSTED’s neutrality, independence and objectivity...

That grotesque abuse of position by Woodhead was typical al of the morally compromised man.

Yet the media generally and the so-called specialist education media in London allowed Woodhead the positive spot that would not deserve had there been any moral standards.

And therein lies the problem of how the 'mainstream British media' and the allied associated institutions cause and contribute to the creation of unaccountability. How they perpetuate lack of accountability. How they thus make it impossible for any standards to be established fro any sustained amounts of time in society.

For Chris Woodhead was NEVER a deeply thoughtful man in possession of original thoughts and ideas about society.

He was also NEVEr a moral person.

His career as a school teacher should, have given the conclusive evidence to put paid to his pretensions that he was able to confect and flaunt around the time that Tony Blair made him the OFSTED boss.

Back to his disservice to the community in Tower Hamlets where Ruth Miskin was employed as head teacher of a primary school.

For Ruth Miskin was given the publicity for her enterprising ‘work’ whilst she was at the primary school that is situated iN Tower Hamlets....

By ALL standards of OBJECTIVE scrutiny, evaluation and assessment, the behaviour of Ruth Miskin whilst she was ta that school In Tower Hamlets,maws no different from the behaviour of the ‘average;’ headteacher to be found in a comparable other school in the same borough at that time.

Whatever ‘edge’ the media ascribed and attributed to Ruth Miskin, was really not real. Not substantial. Not original. Not sustainable.

It was spin.

The only difference being that the spin was decorated with the veneer of ‘professionalism’ as the subject was ‘education’ an allegedly specialist area....

But the lies were unconcealable....undeniable....

The hypes for Ruth Miskin stank of Chris Woodhead ....

[To be continued]

Failing schools in London and in Tower Hamlets is linked with the Big Business Crossrail hole agenda to fail the people and community....

By©Muhammad Haque
2150 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday 10 June 2008

The ‘news’ that schools are failing, including two in Tower Hamlets, is an insult and a disgrace. This is rubbish, not news at all, This is a lie, not fact, least of all evidence of the true state of things. There is no truth in the ‘news’ today that there are ‘two’ secondary schools in Tower Hamlets that have been 'confirmed' as failing. The fact is that there are not two schools that are failing. . The fact in Tower Hamlets is that ALL the schools in Tower Hamlets are falling. And they have been failing...for years... For DECADES...

And the failure is most stark in the failure of the OFSTED to tell the truth than in any other place.

Before examining the current 'inspector' [and what an inappropriate holder of post she is!!!!!] Christine Gilbert as OFSTED ‘chief inspector’. it is important to set out the background facts.

Let’s look at OFSTED’s first inspector Chris Woodhead..

Woodhead has been featured with a large picture in today's EVENING nostandards STANDARD, the so-called ‘London paper’, as the ‘morally higher-grounded’ part of the equation over the failing schools in London.


But Woodhead would not be given that spot had there been any truthful or competent or truly knowledgeable editing on the part of the ‘education staff’ at the London EVENING STANDARD.

There is this culture of lies and lying pervading the media, the institutions and the profession s. This is the real failing. Schools failing is an inevitable consequence, result of that state of failing of standards morality and accountability in society. By the institutions,a and the pillars of society


However inevitable that is, it is important to dissect the occurrence, the events, the conduct, the acts of failures and the actions of the failing persons, their individuals units, institutions....


Woodhead is known as a liar. He has been accused of being a liar to his family and a liar elsewhere.

But Woodhead’s lying does not seem to have stopped him from being given one cosy contract after another. He has even set up a series of ‘education businesses’. With his mistress, alleged mistress and former mistress.... And most visibly, Woodhead seems to be hitting some of the so-called education headlines with unremitting frequency.

As he has done in London today Tuesday 10 June 2008.

Did Chris Woodhead, former holder of the post as ‘Chief inspector’ at OFSTED, lie because he is a liar or was he set up by the Blaring regime to lie?

Did Chris Woodhead steal the ideas and ‘forget’ to acknowledge them?

Did Chris Woodhead know that the ‘ethnic surrogates’ employed and or hired to ‘protect’ him and his audience at the RSA lectures, were blocking Asian and African people who wanted to attend his over-hyped lectures?

Or was it part of scam that ‘ethnic surrogates’ would be hired zs[specifically to target Asian and African persons from attending the RSA events that Woodhead was ‘starring’ at ?

[To be continued]

why Gordon Brown now MUST scrap Crossrail hole Bill

By©Muhammad Haque
0750 Hrs GMT
London Tuesday 20 May 2008

One key lie that Crossrail hole plot-peddling Ken Livingstone perpetrated via the London EVENING nostandards STANDARD as part of Livingstone's promotion of the CRASS rail attacks on the East End of London, was that Crassrail would bring ‘benefits’ to the ‘East End’.

CURIOUS. Strange. Significant.

The very same EVENING STANDARD that allegedly did so many ‘bill boards across L
Back to ...

The ‘benefits’ propaganda of Livingstone:

This is based on the criminally irresponsible ‘knowledge’ on the part of the pedlars that poverty was prevalent in the Eat End which meant that the ‘ordinary East End’ people would be positively welcoming of any package that carried with it the 'prospect' of dangled benefits....

From the start that was a lie....

By ‘benefits’ Livingstone and his corrupt and corrupting entourage meant that it, CRASSrail, would DEGENERATE the community even further than had been the case in the previous 40 years or so. But they did not let on that fact.

They twisted its presentation and dressed it as a positive value that the poverty-attacked in the East End of London would really need and welcome....!!!!

In the previous 40 years, which, significantly, parallels the length of Livingstone's career at the expense of the people in and of London, has also been the ‘era’ in context which has witnessed the appearance and the perpetration and perpetuation of what so called ‘regeneration’.

It has meant DEGENERATION.

As one of the latest perpetrators of that degeneration, Christine Gilbert [appointed and kept as ‘Chief executive in post on Tower Hamlets Crossrail hole plot-inviting Council until 2006] has admitted in another layer of her dishonesty, as she poses as the ‘latest reforming’ inspector of schools at OFSTED [where Blair had her installed as a reward for her degenerating the East End of London]....

Poverty pervades everything in this world crass 'Government'. Stop making ever new announcements. Look fast and hard at the Existing panoply;y of overdone legislation. Sort that mess out. But do so intelligently and honestly.

Start by scrapping the Crossrail hole Bill NOW!!

It contains far more of the wrong things than any other does [except Brown's newest latest Frankenstein one]

[More, later, on why Gordon Brown must still drop the alliance [and dalliance] with Frankenstein in medicine...]


[To be continued]